TY - JOUR
T1 - Temporal and spatial variation in shallow groundwater gradients in a boreal headwater catchment
AU - Erdbrugger, Jana
AU - van Meerveld, Ilja
AU - Seibert, Jan
AU - Bishop, Kevin
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - In humid climates, shallow groundwater is often assumed to be a subdued replica of the surface topography. Nevertheless, the relation between the surface topography and groundwater table can change over time, especially when catchment wetness changes. To investigate the correlation between the surface topography and the groundwater table, we analyzed groundwater levels and gradients in a boreal headwater catchment using 1.5 years of continuous groundwater level data for 75 wells. As expected, groundwater gradients changed with catchment wetness. Gradient directions calculated over short distances (5 m) changed by up to 360 degrees; gradients calculated over larger distances (20 m) varied by up to 270 degrees. The groundwater gradient directions were generally most variable for flatter locations and locations where the local surface slope differed from the surrounding topography. Smoothed digital elevation models (DEMs) represented the groundwater surface better than high resolution DEMs. The optimal degree of smoothing varied over the year and was lowest for very wet periods, such as the snowmelt period, when groundwater tables were high.
AB - In humid climates, shallow groundwater is often assumed to be a subdued replica of the surface topography. Nevertheless, the relation between the surface topography and groundwater table can change over time, especially when catchment wetness changes. To investigate the correlation between the surface topography and the groundwater table, we analyzed groundwater levels and gradients in a boreal headwater catchment using 1.5 years of continuous groundwater level data for 75 wells. As expected, groundwater gradients changed with catchment wetness. Gradient directions calculated over short distances (5 m) changed by up to 360 degrees; gradients calculated over larger distances (20 m) varied by up to 270 degrees. The groundwater gradient directions were generally most variable for flatter locations and locations where the local surface slope differed from the surrounding topography. Smoothed digital elevation models (DEMs) represented the groundwater surface better than high resolution DEMs. The optimal degree of smoothing varied over the year and was lowest for very wet periods, such as the snowmelt period, when groundwater tables were high.
KW - Groundwater gradient
KW - Boreal headwater catchment
KW - Groundwater dynamics
KW - Groundwater levels
KW - Flow directions
KW - Krycklan
KW - Groundwater gradient
KW - Boreal headwater catchment
KW - Groundwater dynamics
KW - Groundwater levels
KW - Flow directions
KW - Krycklan
UR - https://res.slu.se/id/publ/129589
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130301
DO - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130301
M3 - Journal article
SN - 0022-1694
VL - 626
JO - Journal of Hydrology
JF - Journal of Hydrology
IS - Part B
M1 - 130301
ER -