TY - JOUR
T1 - Statement on technical assistance related to the EFSA opinion on transformation of Animal By-Products into biogas and compost
AU - Andreoletti, Olivier
AU - Budka, Herbert
AU - Buncic, Sava
AU - Collins, John D
AU - Griffin, John
AU - Hald, Tine
AU - Havelaar, Arie
AU - Hope, James
AU - Klein, Gunter
AU - McLauchlin, James
AU - Messens, Winy
AU - Müller-Graf, Christine
AU - Nguyen-The, Christophe
AU - Noerrung, Birgit
AU - Peixe, Luisa
AU - Prieto, Maradona Miguel
AU - Ricci, Antonia
AU - Sofos, John
AU - Threlfall, John
AU - Vågsholm, Ivar
AU - Vanopdenbosch, Emmanuel
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - EFSA’s Scientific Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ) was asked by the European Commission to clarify i) whether additional testing for Clostridium perfringens of the end product obtained from biogas and compost transformation of Animal By-Products (ABPs) would respond to the concerns expressed in the EFSA 2005 opinion on "the safety vis-à-vis biological risks of biogas and compost treatment standards of animal by-products" and, should this was not be the case, ii) to indicate if additional testing, according to the model of method 7 of the ABP Regulation, for another pathogen than Clostridium perfringens would respond to the recommendations laid down in the abovementioned opinion. Considering that digestion residues and compost are intended to be applied on land, that land naturally contains bacterial spores and that Clostridium perfringens is ubiquitous, the BIOHAZ Panel concluded that the absence of Clostridium perfringens is not necessary. The BIOHAZ Panel also concluded that end product testing does not respond to the recommendations given in the previous EFSA opinion, which concerns the validation of the efficacy of a process
AB - EFSA’s Scientific Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ) was asked by the European Commission to clarify i) whether additional testing for Clostridium perfringens of the end product obtained from biogas and compost transformation of Animal By-Products (ABPs) would respond to the concerns expressed in the EFSA 2005 opinion on "the safety vis-à-vis biological risks of biogas and compost treatment standards of animal by-products" and, should this was not be the case, ii) to indicate if additional testing, according to the model of method 7 of the ABP Regulation, for another pathogen than Clostridium perfringens would respond to the recommendations laid down in the abovementioned opinion. Considering that digestion residues and compost are intended to be applied on land, that land naturally contains bacterial spores and that Clostridium perfringens is ubiquitous, the BIOHAZ Panel concluded that the absence of Clostridium perfringens is not necessary. The BIOHAZ Panel also concluded that end product testing does not respond to the recommendations given in the previous EFSA opinion, which concerns the validation of the efficacy of a process
KW - Animal By-Products
KW - Biogas
KW - Compost
KW - Clostridium perfringens
KW - Technical assistance
KW - Animal By-Products
KW - Biogas
KW - Compost
KW - Clostridium perfringens
KW - Technical assistance
UR - https://res.slu.se/id/publ/27012
UR - http://www.efsa.europa.eu/cs/BlobServer/Scientific_Opinion/1370.pdf?ssbinary=true
U2 - 10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1370
DO - 10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1370
M3 - Journal article
SN - 1831-4732
VL - 7
JO - EFSA Journal
JF - EFSA Journal
IS - 11
M1 - 1370
ER -