TY - JOUR
T1 - Spatial distribution of tree-related microhabitats in European beech-dominated forests
AU - Larrieu, Laurent
AU - Bouget, Christophe
AU - Courbaud, Benoit
AU - Doerfler, Inken
AU - Gouix, Nicolas
AU - Goulard, Michel
AU - Ladet, Sylvie
AU - Laroche, Fabien
AU - Acloque, Amandine
AU - Butler, Rita
AU - Kozak, Daniel
AU - Kraus, Daniel
AU - Krumm, Frank
AU - Lachat, Thibault
AU - Martin, Maxence
AU - Mueller, Joerg
AU - Paillet, Yoan
AU - Schuck, Andreas
AU - Stillhard, Jonas
AU - Svoboda, Miroslav
AU - Garcia, Maria Trinidad Torres
AU - Vandekerkhove, Kris
AU - Zudin, Sergey
AU - Torres García, María Trinidad
AU - et al.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Tree-related Microhabitats (TreMs) are of prime concern for biodiversity since they host thousands of taxa. TreMs are discrete habitat patches borne by trees and cover a wide range of lifespans, from days to decades to centuries. The taxa associated with such discrete and sometimes highly ephemeral habitat patches are likely to be sensitive to spatial distribution because they need to search for new habitats after the occupied one disappears. Although many studies have recently been dedicated to TreMs, only very few have investigated their spatial distribution. Focusing on European beech-dominated forests, we used a European TreM database with 12,362 trees and 296 plots (ranging from local (0.1-1 ha) to landscape scale (10,000 ha)) to assess TreM spatial distribution patterns in long unmanaged forests. Then, with a TreM sub-database with 6828 trees and 21 plots, we assessed whether and if so, how harvesting changes spatial patterns at the plot scale. In long unmanaged forests, most TreMs showed a regular pattern at the plot scale and an aggregated pattern at larger scales. Tree diameter was the most influential factor for spatial patterns in TreMs. Spatial patterns at the plot scale in harvested forests differed slightly from those observed in unmanaged forests. To favor TreM-dwelling taxa in harvested stands, our results suggest retaining habitat trees in a regular spatial pattern to mimic the natural pattern. However, some TreMs should be conserved in an aggregate pattern; we specify the spatial scale at which this should be done.
AB - Tree-related Microhabitats (TreMs) are of prime concern for biodiversity since they host thousands of taxa. TreMs are discrete habitat patches borne by trees and cover a wide range of lifespans, from days to decades to centuries. The taxa associated with such discrete and sometimes highly ephemeral habitat patches are likely to be sensitive to spatial distribution because they need to search for new habitats after the occupied one disappears. Although many studies have recently been dedicated to TreMs, only very few have investigated their spatial distribution. Focusing on European beech-dominated forests, we used a European TreM database with 12,362 trees and 296 plots (ranging from local (0.1-1 ha) to landscape scale (10,000 ha)) to assess TreM spatial distribution patterns in long unmanaged forests. Then, with a TreM sub-database with 6828 trees and 21 plots, we assessed whether and if so, how harvesting changes spatial patterns at the plot scale. In long unmanaged forests, most TreMs showed a regular pattern at the plot scale and an aggregated pattern at larger scales. Tree diameter was the most influential factor for spatial patterns in TreMs. Spatial patterns at the plot scale in harvested forests differed slightly from those observed in unmanaged forests. To favor TreM-dwelling taxa in harvested stands, our results suggest retaining habitat trees in a regular spatial pattern to mimic the natural pattern. However, some TreMs should be conserved in an aggregate pattern; we specify the spatial scale at which this should be done.
KW - Fagus sylvatica
KW - Long unmanaged forest
KW - TreM
KW - biodiversity conservation
KW - forest management
KW - Fagus sylvatica
KW - Long unmanaged forest
KW - TreM
KW - biodiversity conservation
KW - forest management
UR - https://res.slu.se/id/publ/140475
U2 - 10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110867
DO - 10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110867
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85209952613
SN - 0006-3207
VL - 301
JO - Biological Conservation
JF - Biological Conservation
M1 - 110867
ER -