TY - JOUR
T1 - Scientific Opinion on On-site treatment of pig carcasses
AU - Andreoletti, Olivier
AU - Budka, Herbert
AU - Buncic, Sava
AU - Collins, John D
AU - Griffin, John
AU - Hald, Tine
AU - Havelaar, Arie H
AU - Hope, James
AU - Klein, Gunter
AU - Koustsomanis, Kostas
AU - McLauchlin, James
AU - Muller, Graf Christine
AU - Nguyen, The Christophe
AU - Nörrung, Birgit
AU - Peixe, Luisa
AU - Prieto, Maradona Miguel
AU - Ricci, Antonia
AU - Sofos, John
AU - Thelfall, John
AU - Vanopdenbosch, Emmanuel
AU - Vågsholm, Ivar
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - EFSA’s Scientific Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ) was asked for a scientific opinion on an alternative method for processing Category (Cat) 2 Animal By-Products (ABP). The materials to be treated are placentas and fallen pigs; this implies that the animals died due to a disease, which in most cases was not properly diagnosed. The target parameters are: i) particle size less than 150 mm and ii) heating for 10 – 12 hours at 100°C. The end-product obtained is mixed with pig slurry and used as an organic fertiliser. According to the legislation in force, before being used as an organic fertiliser, Cat. 2 material should be treated with a sterilisation process (i.e. 133°C / 20 min / 3 bars / 50 mm particle size). The most resistant hazards identified by the applicant as target to demonstrate the risk reduction are spores of pathogenic clostridia. Due to uncertainty on the cause of the animals’ death, the presence of more resistant hazards cannot be considered negligible. The sterilisation process defined in the current legislation is able to minimise the risks due to unidentified agents, such as Bacillus anthracis and TSE agents. The BIOHAZ Panel concluded that the process proposed was not properly validated experimentally under real scale conditions. In theory, it should permit a high degree of reduction of spores of pathogenic clostridia but because of several uncertainties (i.e. water evaporation, fat protective effect and particle size) it is not certain that the values of the parameters used in the theoretical calculations would apply in practice. Moreover, the proposed alternative method cannot be considered equivalent to the sterilisation process defined in the current legislation. This would be particularly relevant in the case of extremely heat resistant spores being present in the material to be treated
AB - EFSA’s Scientific Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ) was asked for a scientific opinion on an alternative method for processing Category (Cat) 2 Animal By-Products (ABP). The materials to be treated are placentas and fallen pigs; this implies that the animals died due to a disease, which in most cases was not properly diagnosed. The target parameters are: i) particle size less than 150 mm and ii) heating for 10 – 12 hours at 100°C. The end-product obtained is mixed with pig slurry and used as an organic fertiliser. According to the legislation in force, before being used as an organic fertiliser, Cat. 2 material should be treated with a sterilisation process (i.e. 133°C / 20 min / 3 bars / 50 mm particle size). The most resistant hazards identified by the applicant as target to demonstrate the risk reduction are spores of pathogenic clostridia. Due to uncertainty on the cause of the animals’ death, the presence of more resistant hazards cannot be considered negligible. The sterilisation process defined in the current legislation is able to minimise the risks due to unidentified agents, such as Bacillus anthracis and TSE agents. The BIOHAZ Panel concluded that the process proposed was not properly validated experimentally under real scale conditions. In theory, it should permit a high degree of reduction of spores of pathogenic clostridia but because of several uncertainties (i.e. water evaporation, fat protective effect and particle size) it is not certain that the values of the parameters used in the theoretical calculations would apply in practice. Moreover, the proposed alternative method cannot be considered equivalent to the sterilisation process defined in the current legislation. This would be particularly relevant in the case of extremely heat resistant spores being present in the material to be treated
KW - Animal By-Products
KW - alternative methods
KW - equivalence
KW - on-site treatment
KW - pig carcasses
KW - Animal By-Products
KW - alternative methods
KW - equivalence
KW - on-site treatment
KW - pig carcasses
UR - https://res.slu.se/id/publ/36921
UR - http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/2425.htm
U2 - 10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2425
DO - 10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2425
M3 - Journal article
SN - 1831-4732
VL - 9
JO - EFSA Journal
JF - EFSA Journal
IS - 11
M1 - 2425
ER -