TY - JOUR
T1 - Phenolic content and antioxidant activity of different Iranian populations of Anabasis aphylla L.
AU - Nadaf, Mohabat
AU - Halimi Khalil Abad, Majid
AU - Gholami, Ali
AU - Taghavizadeh Yazdi, Mohammad Ehsan
AU - Iriti, Marcello
AU - Mottaghipisheh, Javad
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - The Anabasis aphylla L. aerial parts was harvested from five different populations located in Golestan National Park, Iran. The phenolic content and antioxidant potencies of the ethanolic extracts were measured using the Folin–Ciocalteu and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) methods, respectively. Moreover, the effects of two factors soil electrical conductivity and soil acidity on phenolic content and antioxidant properties of the extracts were evaluated. Consequently, no significant difference between different populations of Anabasis aphylla L. in terms of total phenol content was detected; however, a significant difference was observed between the electrical conductivity of the soil samples. The studied factors showed no significant correlation between the electrical conductivity and soil acidity with the total phenol and antioxidant effect, although a negative correlation between total phenol and IC50 (–0.81) was identified. In conclusion, the present study the effect of two factors of soil acidity and electrical conductivity on the amount of total phenol is not confirmed.
AB - The Anabasis aphylla L. aerial parts was harvested from five different populations located in Golestan National Park, Iran. The phenolic content and antioxidant potencies of the ethanolic extracts were measured using the Folin–Ciocalteu and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) methods, respectively. Moreover, the effects of two factors soil electrical conductivity and soil acidity on phenolic content and antioxidant properties of the extracts were evaluated. Consequently, no significant difference between different populations of Anabasis aphylla L. in terms of total phenol content was detected; however, a significant difference was observed between the electrical conductivity of the soil samples. The studied factors showed no significant correlation between the electrical conductivity and soil acidity with the total phenol and antioxidant effect, although a negative correlation between total phenol and IC50 (–0.81) was identified. In conclusion, the present study the effect of two factors of soil acidity and electrical conductivity on the amount of total phenol is not confirmed.
KW - Anabasis aphylla
KW - antioxidants
KW - phenols
KW - soil acidity
KW - soil electrical conductivity
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85143086909
UR - https://res.slu.se/id/publ/931001e8-52cb-4671-bcb1-5b71362e7a87
U2 - 10.1080/14786419.2022.2150621
DO - 10.1080/14786419.2022.2150621
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 36448308
AN - SCOPUS:85143086909
SN - 1478-6419
VL - 38
SP - 1606
EP - 1610
JO - Natural Product Research
JF - Natural Product Research
IS - 9
ER -