TY - JOUR
T1 - Mixing effects on Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) productivity along a climatic gradient across Europe
AU - Ruiz-Peinado, Ricardo
AU - Pretzsch, Hans
AU - Lof, Magnus
AU - Heym, Michael
AU - Bielak, Kamil
AU - Aldea, Jorge
AU - Barbeito, Ignacio
AU - Brazaitis, Gediminas
AU - Drossler, Lars
AU - Godvod, Ksistof
AU - Granhus, Aksel
AU - Holm, Stig-Olof
AU - Jansons, Aris
AU - Makrickiene, Ekaterina
AU - Metslaid, Marek
AU - Metslaid, Sandra
AU - Nothdurft, Arne
AU - Reventlow, Ditlev Otto Juel
AU - Sitko, Roman
AU - Stankeviciene, Gintare
AU - del Rio, Miren
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Mixed-species stands have been found to be more productive than would be expected from the performance of their component species in monocultures due to facilitation and complementarity between species, although these interactions depend on the combination of species present. Our study focuses on monospecific and mixed species stands of Scots pine and Norway spruce using 20 triplets established in nine countries along a climatic gradient across Europe. Differences in mean tree and stand characteristics, productivity and stand structure were assessed. Basal area increment in mixed stands was 8% higher than expected while volume increment was only 2% greater. Scots pine trees growing in mixed-species stands showed 11% larger quadratic mean diameter, 7% larger dominant diameter, 17% higher basal area and 25% higher stand volume than trees growing in mono specific stands. Norway spruce showed only a non-significant tendency to lower mean values of diameters, heights, basal area, as well standing volume in mixtures than monocultures. Stand structure indices differed between mixed stands and monocultures of Scots pine showing a greater stratification in mixed-species stands. Furthermore, the studied morphological traits showed little variability for trees growing in monospecific stands, except for diameter at breast height, crown length and crown length ratio. For trees growing in mixed stands, all the morphological traits of the trees were identified as different. Some of these morphological traits were associated with relative productivity. Nevertheless, relative productivity in mixed-species stands was not related to site conditions.
AB - Mixed-species stands have been found to be more productive than would be expected from the performance of their component species in monocultures due to facilitation and complementarity between species, although these interactions depend on the combination of species present. Our study focuses on monospecific and mixed species stands of Scots pine and Norway spruce using 20 triplets established in nine countries along a climatic gradient across Europe. Differences in mean tree and stand characteristics, productivity and stand structure were assessed. Basal area increment in mixed stands was 8% higher than expected while volume increment was only 2% greater. Scots pine trees growing in mixed-species stands showed 11% larger quadratic mean diameter, 7% larger dominant diameter, 17% higher basal area and 25% higher stand volume than trees growing in mono specific stands. Norway spruce showed only a non-significant tendency to lower mean values of diameters, heights, basal area, as well standing volume in mixtures than monocultures. Stand structure indices differed between mixed stands and monocultures of Scots pine showing a greater stratification in mixed-species stands. Furthermore, the studied morphological traits showed little variability for trees growing in monospecific stands, except for diameter at breast height, crown length and crown length ratio. For trees growing in mixed stands, all the morphological traits of the trees were identified as different. Some of these morphological traits were associated with relative productivity. Nevertheless, relative productivity in mixed-species stands was not related to site conditions.
KW - Monospecific and mixed-species stands
KW - Overyielding
KW - Stand structure
KW - Complementarity
KW - Triplet approach
KW - Monospecific and mixed-species stands
KW - Overyielding
KW - Stand structure
KW - Complementarity
KW - Triplet approach
UR - https://res.slu.se/id/publ/111088
U2 - 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118834
DO - 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118834
M3 - Journal article
SN - 0378-1127
VL - 482
JO - Forest Ecology and Management
JF - Forest Ecology and Management
M1 - 118834
ER -