Återgå till huvudnavigering Återgå till sök Gå direkt till huvudinnehållet

Green infrastructure development at European Union's eastern border: Effects of road infrastructure and forest habitat loss

  • Per Angelstam
  • , Olha Khaulyak
  • , Taras Yamelynets
  • , Gintautas Mozgeris
  • , Vladimir Naumov
  • , Tadeusz J. Chmielewski
  • , Marine Elbakidze
  • , Michael Manton
  • , Bohdan Prots
  • , Sviataslau Valasiuk

Publikation: Bidrag till tidskriftArtikel i vetenskaplig tidskriftPeer review

Sammanfattning

The functionality of forest patches and networks as green infrastructure may be affected negatively both by expanding road networks and forestry intensification. We assessed the effects of (1) the current and planned road infrastructure, and (2) forest loss and gain, on the remaining large forest landscape massifs as green infrastructure at the EU's eastern border region in post -socialistic transition. First, habitat patch and network functionality in 1996-98 was assessed using habitat suitability index modelling. Second, we made expert interviews about road development with planners in 10 administrative regions in Poland, Belarus and Ukraine. Third, forest loss and gain inside the forest massifs, and gain outside them during the period 2001-14 were measured. This EU cross -border region hosts four remaining forest massifs as regional green infrastructure hotspots. While Poland's road network is developing fast in terms of new freeways, city bypasses and upgrades of road quality, in Belarus and Ukraine the focus is on maintenance of existing roads, and no new corridors. We conclude that economic support from the EU, and thus rapid development of roads in Poland, is likely to reduce the permeability for wildlife of the urban and agricultural matrix around existing forest massifs. However, the four identified forest massifs themselves, forming the forest landscape green infrastructure at the EU's east border, were little affected by road development plans. In contrast, forest loss inside massifs was high, especially in Ukraine. Only in Poland forest loss was balanced by gain. Forest gain outside forest massifs was low. To conclude, pro-ctive and collaborative spatial planning across different sectors and countries is needed to secure functional forest green infrastructure as base for biodiversity conservation and human well-being. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
OriginalspråkEngelska
Sidor (från-till)300-311
Antal sidor12
TidskriftJournal of Environmental Management
Volym193
DOI
StatusPublicerad - 2017

FN:s SDG:er

Detta resultat bidrar till följande hållbara utvecklingsmål:

  1. SDG 3 – God hälsa och välbefinnande
    SDG 3 – God hälsa och välbefinnande
  2. SDG 9 – Hållbar industri, innovationer och infrastruktur
    SDG 9 – Hållbar industri, innovationer och infrastruktur
  3. SDG 11 – Hållbara städer och samhällen
    SDG 11 – Hållbara städer och samhällen

Nyckelord

  • Biodiversity Ecosystem services
  • Functional habitat networks
  • Road development
  • Forest loss and gain
  • Development co-operation

Citera det här