TY - JOUR
T1 - Fine-scale conservation planning outside of reserves: Cost-effective selection of retention patches at final harvest
AU - Perhans, Karin
AU - Glöde, Dan
AU - Gilbertsson, Jessica
AU - Persson, Anette
AU - Gustafsson, Lena
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - Retaining forest patches at final harvest is a key conservation measure in boreal forests, but guidelines for how to increase its cost-effectiveness are lacking. In a study in boreal Sweden, we compared the cost-effectiveness of three different approaches a forest owner may use to select patches: selection based on the conservation value of patches alone, economic cost alone or both of them combined. We also compared the cost-effectiveness of six different common types of patches. Conservation value was measured as species richness of bryophytes and lichens and as structural characteristics of patches. Compared to the selection approach in which both conservation value and cost were used, cost-effectiveness was 5-14% lower when only conservation value was used, depending on how conservation value was measured. On the contrary, using only the economic cost decreased the cost-effectiveness by only 1-2%. Among the patch types, swamp forest areas and deciduous tree groups were cost-effective types to retain. However, the patch types were complementary in their species composition and all hosted unique species. We argue that, ideally, assessments of both conservation values and economic costs of retaining patches should be made prior to harvest to enable planners to make well-informed and cost-effective decisions. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
AB - Retaining forest patches at final harvest is a key conservation measure in boreal forests, but guidelines for how to increase its cost-effectiveness are lacking. In a study in boreal Sweden, we compared the cost-effectiveness of three different approaches a forest owner may use to select patches: selection based on the conservation value of patches alone, economic cost alone or both of them combined. We also compared the cost-effectiveness of six different common types of patches. Conservation value was measured as species richness of bryophytes and lichens and as structural characteristics of patches. Compared to the selection approach in which both conservation value and cost were used, cost-effectiveness was 5-14% lower when only conservation value was used, depending on how conservation value was measured. On the contrary, using only the economic cost decreased the cost-effectiveness by only 1-2%. Among the patch types, swamp forest areas and deciduous tree groups were cost-effective types to retain. However, the patch types were complementary in their species composition and all hosted unique species. We argue that, ideally, assessments of both conservation values and economic costs of retaining patches should be made prior to harvest to enable planners to make well-informed and cost-effective decisions. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
KW - Boreal forest
KW - Biodiversity
KW - Economics
KW - Green-tree retention
KW - Policy
KW - Variable retention harvesting
KW - Boreal forest
KW - Biodiversity
KW - Economics
KW - Green-tree retention
KW - Policy
KW - Variable retention harvesting
UR - https://res.slu.se/id/publ/57420
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.11.014
DO - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.11.014
M3 - Journal article
SN - 0921-8009
VL - 70
SP - 771
EP - 777
JO - Ecological Economics
JF - Ecological Economics
IS - 4
ER -