TY - JOUR
T1 - Discrete element modelling of stress propagation in soil under a rigid wheel in a soil bin: a simulation of probe inducing stress deviation and wheel speed
AU - Bahrami, Mostafa
AU - Naderi-Boldaji, Mojtaba
AU - Ghanbarian, Davoud
AU - Keller, Thomas
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 IAgrE
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Discrete element method (DEM) is a suitable technique for simulation of stress propagation in soils, particularly with freshly tilled or aggregated structures. Measurement of true stress, in the absence of a stress-measuring probe inserted in the soil, is not experimentally possible. Stress probes may therefore under- or over-estimate true soil stress. Building on previous work simulating vertical stress propagation under plate sinkage loading, the study modelled stress propagation under a moving rigid wheel. The aim was to determine how vertical stress, with and without a probe, at a given depth may differ under dynamic loading vs. static plate sinkage loading and with varying wheel speed. DEM parameters of the hysteretic spring-linear cohesion contact model were calibrated by a cone penetration test which was validated by wheel sinkage into the soil. Two tests were conducted in a soil bin at a water content of 11% d.b; at a bulk density of 1200 kg m(-3) and a wheel loading of 600 N, and at a bulk density of 1350 kg m(-3) and wheel loading of 1200 N. Vertical soil stress was measured at 0.15 m depth using a cylindrical load cell probe. The DEM simulation underestimated the measured stress by an average 13%. Average stress overestimation ratio (with/without probe stress) was found to be 1.12, which agreed with measurements beneath the plate during plate sinkage loading. Increasing wheel speed from 0.2 to 6 m s(-1) showed a 7% increase in DEM-simulated with-probe stress. (c) 2023 IAgrE. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
AB - Discrete element method (DEM) is a suitable technique for simulation of stress propagation in soils, particularly with freshly tilled or aggregated structures. Measurement of true stress, in the absence of a stress-measuring probe inserted in the soil, is not experimentally possible. Stress probes may therefore under- or over-estimate true soil stress. Building on previous work simulating vertical stress propagation under plate sinkage loading, the study modelled stress propagation under a moving rigid wheel. The aim was to determine how vertical stress, with and without a probe, at a given depth may differ under dynamic loading vs. static plate sinkage loading and with varying wheel speed. DEM parameters of the hysteretic spring-linear cohesion contact model were calibrated by a cone penetration test which was validated by wheel sinkage into the soil. Two tests were conducted in a soil bin at a water content of 11% d.b; at a bulk density of 1200 kg m(-3) and a wheel loading of 600 N, and at a bulk density of 1350 kg m(-3) and wheel loading of 1200 N. Vertical soil stress was measured at 0.15 m depth using a cylindrical load cell probe. The DEM simulation underestimated the measured stress by an average 13%. Average stress overestimation ratio (with/without probe stress) was found to be 1.12, which agreed with measurements beneath the plate during plate sinkage loading. Increasing wheel speed from 0.2 to 6 m s(-1) showed a 7% increase in DEM-simulated with-probe stress. (c) 2023 IAgrE. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
KW - Discrete element method
KW - Soil bin
KW - Stress overestimation
KW - Stress probe
KW - Stress propagation
KW - Discrete element method
KW - Soil bin
KW - Stress overestimation
KW - Stress probe
KW - Stress propagation
UR - https://res.slu.se/id/publ/122950
U2 - 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2023.04.013
DO - 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2023.04.013
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85156155828
SN - 1537-5110
VL - 230
SP - 159
EP - 170
JO - Biosystems Engineering
JF - Biosystems Engineering
ER -