TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of a hybrid public–private natural area governance model in the Adirondack Park of New York State
AU - McNulty, Stacy
AU - Luzadis, Valerie A.
AU - Hirsch, Paul
AU - Limburg, Karin
AU - Diemont, Stewart A.W.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - We applied Elinor Ostrom’s design principles (DPs) for governing public goods and her associated concept of polycentricity to describe how a hybrid public-private governance network emerged in Adirondack Park. We gathered evidence of key park decisions since 1880, including who was involved and at what scale each event occurred, to characterize how Park governance became more participatory over time. While state government dominated the decision space, the number of organizations involved in key policy events increased by six-fold and included more non-governmental and private land groups by 2020, along with mechanisms for joint decision-making and the emergence of self-organization at the local scale. While shared administration of protected areas can create inefficiencies, it can also enable resilience in the face of novel events and change. We found that determining which DPs were operational in a time period helped us evaluate both the developmental trajectory and governance of the large, multi-jurisdictional Adirondack Park. Given the complexity of current global environmental and socio-economic challenges, we suggest this as a valuable method for similar complex, public/private natural areas.
AB - We applied Elinor Ostrom’s design principles (DPs) for governing public goods and her associated concept of polycentricity to describe how a hybrid public-private governance network emerged in Adirondack Park. We gathered evidence of key park decisions since 1880, including who was involved and at what scale each event occurred, to characterize how Park governance became more participatory over time. While state government dominated the decision space, the number of organizations involved in key policy events increased by six-fold and included more non-governmental and private land groups by 2020, along with mechanisms for joint decision-making and the emergence of self-organization at the local scale. While shared administration of protected areas can create inefficiencies, it can also enable resilience in the face of novel events and change. We found that determining which DPs were operational in a time period helped us evaluate both the developmental trajectory and governance of the large, multi-jurisdictional Adirondack Park. Given the complexity of current global environmental and socio-economic challenges, we suggest this as a valuable method for similar complex, public/private natural areas.
KW - Design principles
KW - polycentric governance
KW - private land rights
KW - protected areas
KW - public resource management
KW - shared decision-making
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105002168945
UR - https://res.slu.se/id/publ/f08bd7c3-ab6f-4d92-a61e-2445247d3477
U2 - 10.1080/1523908X.2025.2487083
DO - 10.1080/1523908X.2025.2487083
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:105002168945
SN - 1523-908X
VL - 27
SP - 560
EP - 572
JO - Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning
JF - Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning
IS - 5
ER -