Sammanfattning
Within the European Union, it is agreed that watershed-based management of water quality problems is more efficient than centralised arrangements. In this study, a mechanism for allocating international funds to watershed authorities for nitrogen abatement in the presence of moral hazard is investigated. The results show that when there is a risk of climate change, the cost of moral hazard to the international funding agency can be high if there is a moderate likelihood of climate change and the watershed authority is guaranteed a high minimum compensation.
| Originalspråk | Engelska |
|---|---|
| Sidor (från-till) | 327-351 |
| Antal sidor | 25 |
| Tidskrift | European Review of Agricultural Economics |
| Volym | 41 |
| Nummer | 2 |
| DOI | |
| Status | Publicerad - 2014 |
FN:s SDG:er
Detta resultat bidrar till följande hållbara utvecklingsmål:
-
SDG 6 – Rent vatten och sanitet för alla
-
SDG 13 – Bekämpa klimatförändringarna
Nyckelord
- nitrogen
- climate change
- moral hazard
- Baltic Sea
- policy instruments
Citera det här
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver