TY - JOUR
T1 - Agronomic Practices for Improving Gentle Remediation of Trace Element-Contaminated Soils
AU - Kidd, Petra
AU - Mench, Michel
AU - Alvarez-Lopez, Vanessa
AU - Bert, Valerie
AU - Dimitriou, Ioannis
AU - Friesl-Hanl, Wolfgang
AU - Herzig, Rolf
AU - Janssen, Jolien Olga
AU - Kolbas, Aliaksandr
AU - Mueller, Ingo
AU - Neu, Silke
AU - Renella, Giancarlo
AU - Ruttens, Ann
AU - Vangronsveld, Jaco
AU - Puschenreiter, Markus
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - The last few decades have seen the rise of Gentle soil Remediation Options (GRO), which notably include in situ contaminant stabilization ("inactivation") and plant-based (generally termed "phytoremediation") options. For trace element (TE)-contaminated sites, GRO aim to either decrease their labile pool and/or total content in the soil, thereby reducing related pollutant linkages. Much research has been dedicated to the screening and selection of TE-tolerant plant species and genotypes for application in GRO. However, the number of field trials demonstrating successful GRO remains well below the number of studies carried out at a greenhouse level. The move from greenhouse to field conditions requires incorporating agronomical knowledge into the remediation process and the ecological restoration of ecosystem services. This review summarizes agronomic practices against their demonstrated or potential positive effect on GRO performance, including plant selection, soil management practices, crop rotation, short rotation coppice, intercropping/row cropping, planting methods and plant densities, harvest and fertilization management, pest and weed control and irrigation management. Potentially negative effects of GRO, e.g., the introduction of potentially invasive species, are also discussed. Lessons learnt from long-term European field case sites are given for aiding the choice of appropriate management practices and plant species.
AB - The last few decades have seen the rise of Gentle soil Remediation Options (GRO), which notably include in situ contaminant stabilization ("inactivation") and plant-based (generally termed "phytoremediation") options. For trace element (TE)-contaminated sites, GRO aim to either decrease their labile pool and/or total content in the soil, thereby reducing related pollutant linkages. Much research has been dedicated to the screening and selection of TE-tolerant plant species and genotypes for application in GRO. However, the number of field trials demonstrating successful GRO remains well below the number of studies carried out at a greenhouse level. The move from greenhouse to field conditions requires incorporating agronomical knowledge into the remediation process and the ecological restoration of ecosystem services. This review summarizes agronomic practices against their demonstrated or potential positive effect on GRO performance, including plant selection, soil management practices, crop rotation, short rotation coppice, intercropping/row cropping, planting methods and plant densities, harvest and fertilization management, pest and weed control and irrigation management. Potentially negative effects of GRO, e.g., the introduction of potentially invasive species, are also discussed. Lessons learnt from long-term European field case sites are given for aiding the choice of appropriate management practices and plant species.
KW - crop rotation
KW - ecosystem services
KW - fertilization
KW - harvest management
KW - phytomanagement
KW - phytoremediation
KW - soil contamination
KW - crop rotation
KW - ecosystem services
KW - fertilization
KW - harvest management
KW - phytomanagement
KW - phytoremediation
KW - soil contamination
UR - https://res.slu.se/id/publ/75625
U2 - 10.1080/15226514.2014.1003788
DO - 10.1080/15226514.2014.1003788
M3 - Review article
C2 - 25581041
SN - 1522-6514
VL - 17
SP - 1005
EP - 1037
JO - International Journal of Phytoremediation
JF - International Journal of Phytoremediation
IS - 11
ER -