Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Tracking the origin of faecal pollution in surface water: an ongoing project within the European Union research programme

  • Jakob Ottoson
  • , A Blanch
  • , A Iversen
  • , C Gantzer
  • , C Kourtis
  • , F Lucena
  • , G Papageorgiou
  • , H Taylor
  • , I Kühn
  • , J Ebdon
  • , J Jofre
  • , J Schwartzbrod
  • , J Wallis
  • , L Belanche-Munoz
  • , L Moce
  • , M Muniesa
  • , S Skraber
  • , X Bonjoch

    Publication: Contribution to journalJournal article

    Abstract

    The objectives of this study are to generate knowledge about methods to track the sources of faecal pollution in surface waters, with the aim of having one or a few easy procedures applicable to different geographic areas in Europe. For this, a first field study using already proposed methods (genotypes of F-specific RNA bacteriophages, bacteriophages infecting Bacteroides fragilis, phenotypes of faecal coliforms and enterococci, and sterols) was done in five areas representing a wide array of conditions in Europe. The present faecal indicators (faecal coliforms, enterococci, sulfite reducing clostridia and somatic coliphages) were also included in this first field study. At the same time some emerging methods were settled or adapted to water samples and assayed in a limited number of samples. The results of this first field study indicated that no single parameter alone was able to discriminate the sources, human or non-human, of faecal pollution, but that a 'basket' of 4 or 5 parameters, which includes one of the present faecal indicators, will do so. In addition, numerical analysis of the data showed that this 'basket' will allow the successful building of predictive models. Both the statistical analyses and the studied predictive models indicated that genotype II of F-specific RNA bacteriophages, the coprostanol and the ratio coprostanol:coprostanol+epicoprostanol were, out of the studied parameters, those with a greater discriminating power. Either because unsuccessful adaptation of the methods to water samples or because the preliminary assays in water samples indicated low discriminating capability, only three (sorbitol-fermenting bifidobacteria, some species of bifidobacteria detected by PCR with specific primers and phages infecting Bacteroides tethaiotaomicron) of the newly assayed methods were considered for a second field study, which is currently underway. Expectations are that these new tools will minimize the number of parameters in the 'basket', or at least minimize the difficulty in assaying them
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)249-260
    JournalJournal of Water and Health
    Volume2
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2004

    Cite this