Abstract
How to account for emissions from LUC is highly debated and there is no current shared consensus. Different LUC methods result in significantly different results. In this study, four different LUC methods are applied, using data for organic milk production and high yielding conventional milk production systems in Sweden. Depending on which LUC method was applied, the organic system showed about 50% higher or 40% lower CF compared to the conventional high yielding system. Thus, when reporting CF numbers, it is important to report LUC-factors separately and clearly explain the underlying assumptions, since the method of accounting for LUC can drastically change the results. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 134-142 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Journal of Cleaner Production |
| Volume | 28 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2012 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
-
SDG 15 Life on Land
Keywords
- LCA
- System expansion
- Allocation
- LUC
- Milk production
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver