TY - JOUR
T1 - Sustainable development of food production: A case study on scenarios for pig production
AU - Stern, Susanne
AU - Sonesson, Ulf
AU - Öborn, Ingrid
AU - Kumm, Karl-Ivar
AU - Nybrant, Thomas Gunnar
AU - Gunnarsson, Stefan
PY - 2005
Y1 - 2005
N2 - To study future, sustainable production systems, a step-wise method was used to create three future scenarios for pig production based on different sustainability goals. The first scenario focused on animal welfare and the natural behavior of the animals. The second targeted low impacts on the environment and the efficient use of natural resources. The third scenario aimed at product quality and safety. Each scenario fulfilled different aspects of sustainability, but there were goal conflicts because no scenario fulfilled all sustainability goals. The scenarios were then parameterized. The environmental impact was calculated using the life-cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, and the economic cost was calculated from the same data set. The cost per kilo of pork was highest for the animal welfare scenario and similar for the other two scenarios. The environmental scenario had the lowest environmental impact, and the product-quality scenario the highest. The results are discussed based on different future priorities
AB - To study future, sustainable production systems, a step-wise method was used to create three future scenarios for pig production based on different sustainability goals. The first scenario focused on animal welfare and the natural behavior of the animals. The second targeted low impacts on the environment and the efficient use of natural resources. The third scenario aimed at product quality and safety. Each scenario fulfilled different aspects of sustainability, but there were goal conflicts because no scenario fulfilled all sustainability goals. The scenarios were then parameterized. The environmental impact was calculated using the life-cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, and the economic cost was calculated from the same data set. The cost per kilo of pork was highest for the animal welfare scenario and similar for the other two scenarios. The environmental scenario had the lowest environmental impact, and the product-quality scenario the highest. The results are discussed based on different future priorities
UR - https://res.slu.se/id/publ/39647
UR - http://www.bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1579/0044-7447-34.4.402
U2 - 10.1579/0044-7447-34.4.402
DO - 10.1579/0044-7447-34.4.402
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 16092276
SN - 0044-7447
VL - 34
SP - 402
EP - 407
JO - AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment
JF - AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment
IS - 4-5
ER -