Abstract
This paper presents a first empirical assessment of carnivore conservation under a performance payment scheme. In Sweden, reindeer herder villages are paid based on the number of lynx (lynx lynx) and wolverine (gulo gulo) offspring certified on their pastures. The villages decide on the internal payment distribution. It is generally assumed that benefit distribution rules are exogenous. We investigate them as an endogenous decision. The data reveals that villages' group size has a direct negative effect on conservation outcomes and an indirect positive effect which impacts conservation outcomes through the benefit distribution rule. This result revises the collective action hypothesis on purely negative effects of group size.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 613-631 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Environmental and Resource Economics |
| Volume | 59 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2014 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 15 Life on Land
Keywords
- Performance payments
- Group payments
- Wildlife conservation
- Empirical policy assessment
- Sweden
- Lynx
- Wolverine
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver