TY - JOUR
T1 - Natural climate solutions
AU - Griscom, Bronson W.
AU - Adams, Justin
AU - Ellis, Peter W.
AU - Houghton, Richard A.
AU - Lomax, Guy
AU - Miteva, Daniela A.
AU - Schlesinger, William H.
AU - Shoch, David
AU - Siikamaki, Juha V.
AU - Smith, Pete
AU - Woodbury, Peter
AU - Zganjar, Chris
AU - Blackman, Allen
AU - Campari, Joao
AU - Conant, Richard T.
AU - Delgado, Christopher
AU - Elias, Patricia
AU - Gopalakrishna, Trisha
AU - Hamsik, Marisa R.
AU - Herrero, Mario
AU - Kiesecker, Joseph
AU - Landis, Emily
AU - Laestadius, Lars
AU - Leavitt, Sara M.
AU - Minnemeyer, Susan
AU - Polasky, Stephen
AU - Potapov, Peter
AU - Putz, Francis E.
AU - Sanderman, Jonathan
AU - Silvius, Marcel
AU - Wollenberg, Eva
AU - Fargione, Joseph
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Better stewardship of land is needed to achieve the Paris Climate Agreement goal of holding warming to below 2 degrees C; however, confusion persists about the specific set of land stewardship options available and their mitigation potential. To address this, we identify and quantify "natural climate solutions" (NCS): 20 conservation, restoration, and improved land management actions that increase carbon storage and/or avoid greenhouse gas emissions across global forests, wetlands, grasslands, and agricultural lands. We find that the maximum potential of NCS-when constrained by food security, fiber security, and biodiversity conservation-is 23.8 petagrams of CO2 equivalent (PgCO(2)e) y(-1) (95% Cl 20.3-37.4). This is >= 30% higher than prior estimates, which did not include the full range of options and safeguards considered here. About half of this maximum (11.3 PgCO(2)e(-1)) represents cost-effective climate mitigation, assuming the social cost of CO2 pollution is >= 100 USD MgCO(2)e(-1) by 2030. Natural climate solutions can provide 37% of cost-effective CO2 mitigation needed through 2030 for a >66% chance of holding warming to below 2 degrees C. One-third of this cost-effective NCS mitigation can be delivered at or below 10 USD MgCO2-1. Most NCS actions-if effectively implemented-also offer water filtration, flood buffering, soil health, biodiversity habitat, and enhanced climate resilience. Work remains to better constrain uncertainty of NCS mitigation estimates. Nevertheless, existing knowledge reported here provides a robust basis for immediate global action to improve ecosystem stewardship as a major solution to climate change.
AB - Better stewardship of land is needed to achieve the Paris Climate Agreement goal of holding warming to below 2 degrees C; however, confusion persists about the specific set of land stewardship options available and their mitigation potential. To address this, we identify and quantify "natural climate solutions" (NCS): 20 conservation, restoration, and improved land management actions that increase carbon storage and/or avoid greenhouse gas emissions across global forests, wetlands, grasslands, and agricultural lands. We find that the maximum potential of NCS-when constrained by food security, fiber security, and biodiversity conservation-is 23.8 petagrams of CO2 equivalent (PgCO(2)e) y(-1) (95% Cl 20.3-37.4). This is >= 30% higher than prior estimates, which did not include the full range of options and safeguards considered here. About half of this maximum (11.3 PgCO(2)e(-1)) represents cost-effective climate mitigation, assuming the social cost of CO2 pollution is >= 100 USD MgCO(2)e(-1) by 2030. Natural climate solutions can provide 37% of cost-effective CO2 mitigation needed through 2030 for a >66% chance of holding warming to below 2 degrees C. One-third of this cost-effective NCS mitigation can be delivered at or below 10 USD MgCO2-1. Most NCS actions-if effectively implemented-also offer water filtration, flood buffering, soil health, biodiversity habitat, and enhanced climate resilience. Work remains to better constrain uncertainty of NCS mitigation estimates. Nevertheless, existing knowledge reported here provides a robust basis for immediate global action to improve ecosystem stewardship as a major solution to climate change.
KW - climate mitigation
KW - forests
KW - agriculture
KW - wetlands
KW - ecosystems
KW - climate mitigation
KW - forests
KW - agriculture
KW - wetlands
KW - ecosystems
UR - https://res.slu.se/id/publ/93131
U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1710465114
DO - 10.1073/pnas.1710465114
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 29078344
SN - 0027-8424
VL - 114
SP - 11645
EP - 11650
JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
IS - 44
ER -