TY - JOUR
T1 - Modelling the distribution and compositional variation of plant communities at the continental scale
AU - Jimenez-Alfaro, Borja
AU - Suarez-Seoane, Susana
AU - Chytry, Milan
AU - Hennekens, Stephan M.
AU - Willner, Wolfgang
AU - Hajek, Michal
AU - Agrillo, Emiliano
AU - Alvarez-Martinez, Jose M.
AU - Bergamini, Ariel
AU - Brisse, Henry
AU - Brunet, Jorg
AU - Casella, Laura
AU - Dite, Daniel
AU - Font, Xavier
AU - Gillet, Francois
AU - Hajkova, Petra
AU - Jansen, Florian
AU - Jandt, Ute
AU - Kacki, Zygmunt
AU - Lenoir, Jonathan
AU - Rodwell, John S.
AU - Schaminee, Joop H. J.
AU - Sekulova, Lucia
AU - Sibik, Jozef
AU - Skvorc, Zeljko
AU - Tsiripidis, Ioannis
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Aim: We investigate whether (1) environmental predictors allow to delineate the distribution of discrete community types at the continental scale and (2) how data completeness influences model generalization in relation to the compositional variation of the modelled entities.Location: Europe.Methods: We used comprehensive datasets of two community types of conservation concern in Europe: acidophilous beech forests and base-rich fens. We computed community distribution models (CDMs) calibrated with environmental predictors to predict the occurrence of both community types, evaluating geographical transferability, interpolation and extrapolation under different scenarios of sampling bias. We used generalized dissimilarity modelling (GDM) to assess the role of geographical and environmental drivers in compositional variation within the predicted distributions.Results: For the two community types, CDMs computed for the whole study area provided good performance when evaluated by random cross-validation and external validation. Geographical transferability provided lower but relatively good performance, while model extrapolation performed poorly when compared with interpolation. Generalized dissimilarity modelling showed a predominant effect of geographical distance on compositional variation, complemented with the environmental predictors that also influenced habitat suitability.Main conclusions: Correlative approaches typically used for modelling the distribution of individual species are also useful for delineating the potential area of occupancy of community types at the continental scale, when using consistent definitions of the modelled entity and high data completeness. The combination of CDMs with GDM further improves the understanding of diversity patterns of plant communities, providing spatially explicit information for mapping vegetation diversity and related habitat types at large scales.
AB - Aim: We investigate whether (1) environmental predictors allow to delineate the distribution of discrete community types at the continental scale and (2) how data completeness influences model generalization in relation to the compositional variation of the modelled entities.Location: Europe.Methods: We used comprehensive datasets of two community types of conservation concern in Europe: acidophilous beech forests and base-rich fens. We computed community distribution models (CDMs) calibrated with environmental predictors to predict the occurrence of both community types, evaluating geographical transferability, interpolation and extrapolation under different scenarios of sampling bias. We used generalized dissimilarity modelling (GDM) to assess the role of geographical and environmental drivers in compositional variation within the predicted distributions.Results: For the two community types, CDMs computed for the whole study area provided good performance when evaluated by random cross-validation and external validation. Geographical transferability provided lower but relatively good performance, while model extrapolation performed poorly when compared with interpolation. Generalized dissimilarity modelling showed a predominant effect of geographical distance on compositional variation, complemented with the environmental predictors that also influenced habitat suitability.Main conclusions: Correlative approaches typically used for modelling the distribution of individual species are also useful for delineating the potential area of occupancy of community types at the continental scale, when using consistent definitions of the modelled entity and high data completeness. The combination of CDMs with GDM further improves the understanding of diversity patterns of plant communities, providing spatially explicit information for mapping vegetation diversity and related habitat types at large scales.
KW - community distribution models
KW - ecosystem properties
KW - extent of occurrence
KW - generalized dissimilarity modelling
KW - habitat conservation
KW - plant communities
KW - vegetation
KW - community distribution models
KW - ecosystem properties
KW - extent of occurrence
KW - generalized dissimilarity modelling
KW - habitat conservation
KW - plant communities
KW - vegetation
UR - https://res.slu.se/id/publ/95917
U2 - 10.1111/ddi.12736
DO - 10.1111/ddi.12736
M3 - Journal article
SN - 1366-9516
VL - 24
SP - 978
EP - 990
JO - Diversity and Distributions
JF - Diversity and Distributions
IS - 7
ER -