Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Modelling the distribution and compositional variation of plant communities at the continental scale

  • Borja Jimenez-Alfaro
  • , Susana Suarez-Seoane
  • , Milan Chytry
  • , Stephan M. Hennekens
  • , Wolfgang Willner
  • , Michal Hajek
  • , Emiliano Agrillo
  • , Jose M. Alvarez-Martinez
  • , Ariel Bergamini
  • , Henry Brisse
  • , Jorg Brunet
  • , Laura Casella
  • , Daniel Dite
  • , Xavier Font
  • , Francois Gillet
  • , Petra Hajkova
  • , Florian Jansen
  • , Ute Jandt
  • , Zygmunt Kacki
  • , Jonathan Lenoir
  • John S. Rodwell, Joop H. J. Schaminee, Lucia Sekulova, Jozef Sibik, Zeljko Skvorc, Ioannis Tsiripidis

Publication: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Abstract

Aim: We investigate whether (1) environmental predictors allow to delineate the distribution of discrete community types at the continental scale and (2) how data completeness influences model generalization in relation to the compositional variation of the modelled entities.Location: Europe.Methods: We used comprehensive datasets of two community types of conservation concern in Europe: acidophilous beech forests and base-rich fens. We computed community distribution models (CDMs) calibrated with environmental predictors to predict the occurrence of both community types, evaluating geographical transferability, interpolation and extrapolation under different scenarios of sampling bias. We used generalized dissimilarity modelling (GDM) to assess the role of geographical and environmental drivers in compositional variation within the predicted distributions.Results: For the two community types, CDMs computed for the whole study area provided good performance when evaluated by random cross-validation and external validation. Geographical transferability provided lower but relatively good performance, while model extrapolation performed poorly when compared with interpolation. Generalized dissimilarity modelling showed a predominant effect of geographical distance on compositional variation, complemented with the environmental predictors that also influenced habitat suitability.Main conclusions: Correlative approaches typically used for modelling the distribution of individual species are also useful for delineating the potential area of occupancy of community types at the continental scale, when using consistent definitions of the modelled entity and high data completeness. The combination of CDMs with GDM further improves the understanding of diversity patterns of plant communities, providing spatially explicit information for mapping vegetation diversity and related habitat types at large scales.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)978-990
Number of pages13
JournalDiversity and Distributions
Volume24
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • community distribution models
  • ecosystem properties
  • extent of occurrence
  • generalized dissimilarity modelling
  • habitat conservation
  • plant communities
  • vegetation

Cite this