Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Leveraging urban consumer perceptions to strengthen marketing for baobab, coconut, and tamarind in Mombasa, Kenya

Publication: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Abstract

Tree-based forest and agroforestry products (TFAPs) are essential for food security, climate resilience and rural livelihoods in Africa, yet knowledge regarding their consumption in rapidly growing urban centres remains limited. This study investigates the uses, practices, and perceptions of baobab, coconut, and tamarind products among households, restaurants, and traders in Mombasa, Kenya. Using a mixed-methods approach grounded in consumer theory, social practice theory, and the 5P marketing framework, the research identifies distinct roles for each species. Findings reveal that coconut serves as a culinary staple, tamarind as a versatile flavouring and beverage ingredient, and baobab primarily as a snack for children. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) identified four key components shaping consumer evaluations: Cultural and Environmental Identity, Health and Wellbeing, Family and Sensory Enjoyment, and Preparation Effort and Utility. While coconut and tamarind are deeply embedded in daily routines due to perceived health benefits and culinary versatility, baobab products consumption remains episodic. The study identifies opportunities to strengthen the value chain through improved quality management in packaging, hygiene, and ready-to-use products, better aligning with urban consumer needs while supporting small-scale branding and promotion.
Original languageEnglish
Article number101269
Number of pages11
JournalTrees, Forests and People
Volume25
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 2 - Zero Hunger
    SDG 2 Zero Hunger
  2. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

Keywords

  • Consumer perceptions
  • Tree-based forest and agroforestry products
  • Urban markets
  • Urban food security
  • Value chains

Cite this