Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Information, attitudes, and consumer evaluations of cultivated meat

Publication: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Abstract

Fast-moving developments for cultivated meat make it crucial to wrestle with prospective challenges and thereby lay the groundwork for a viable commercial market. Despite ample attention to issues of naming and regulation, the effect of information provision on consumer attitudes and evaluations has received less interest, even as claims (positive and negative) about cultivated meat increase in scope and complexity. Accordingly, we employed a 2x2 experimental design with information treatments varying by valence and complexity to explore if information provision influenced purchasing evaluations by way of attitudes. Using a sample of 617 German consumers, we found that whether information accentuated the risks or benefits of cultivated meat had a fundamental impact on explicit attitudes and purchasing evaluations, but not implicit attitudes. The role of complexity was however more nuanced, with an impact only on explicit attitudes and when risks were accentuated. Moreover, using mediation analysis, we revealed that implicit and explicit attitudes serially mediated the relationship between information provision and purchasing evaluations, thereby affecting the overall effectiveness of information. In sum, the findings underscore the importance of implicit and explicit attitudes (as well as food technology neophobia and prior knowledge) for evaluation processes of consumers, along with how disentangling the respective effects of valence and complexity of information enables the development of more effective and tailored messaging approaches.
Original languageEnglish
Article number104226
Number of pages14
JournalFood Quality and Preference
Volume92
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Keywords

  • Cultivated meat
  • Consumer evaluation
  • Implicit attitude
  • Information provision
  • Food technology neophobia
  • Mediation analysis

Cite this