Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Identification of sperm morphometric subpopulations in two different portions of the boar ejaculate and its relation to postthaw quality

  • Fernando Juan Peña
  • , Fernando Saravia-Ramos
  • , Manuel García-Herreros
  • , Ivan Núñez-Martínez
  • , Jose Antonio Tapia
  • , Anders Johannisson
  • , Margareta Wallgren
  • , Heriberto Rodriguez

    Publication: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

    Abstract

    A statistical approach using sequentially principal component analysis (PCA), clustering, and discriminant analyses was. developed to identify sperm morphometric subpopulations in well-defined portions of the fresh boar ejaculate. Semen was obtained as 2 portions (the first 10 mL of the sperm-rich fraction and the rest of. the ejaculate, respectively) and frozen using a conventional protocol. Before freezing, an aliquot was Used for computer-assisted. sperm morphometry analysis (ASMA). Postthaw quality was evaluated using computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA), and an annexin-V/PI assay evaluated sperm membranes. The PCA revealed that 3 variables represented more than 78% of the cumulative variance in sperm subpopulations. The clustering and discriminant analyses, based on 5780 individual spermatozoa, revealed the existence of 4 sperm subpopulations. The relative percentage of these subpopulations Varied between boar and ejaculate portions. Linear regression models based on measured morphometric characteristics could account for up to 36% of the percentage of intact sperm membranes postthaw. The ASMA protocol used in our study was useful to detect subtle morphometric differences between spermatozoa, and the combination of this analysis with a multivariate statistical procedure gave hew information on the biological characteristics of boar ejaculates that is not given by conventional sperm analysis
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)716-723
    Number of pages8
    JournalJournal of Andrology
    Volume26
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2005

    Cite this