TY - JOUR
T1 - How does landscape structure influence catchment transit time across different geomorphic provinces?
AU - Tetzlaff, Dörthe
AU - Seibert, Jan
AU - McGuire, Kevin
AU - Laudon, Hjalmar
AU - Burns, Douglas A.
AU - Soulsby, Chris
AU - Dunn, Sarah M.
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - Despite an increasing number of empirical investigations of catchment transit times (TTs), virtually all are based on individual catchments and there are few attempts to synthesize understanding across different geographical regions. Uniquely, this paper examines data from 55 catchments in five geomorphic provinces in northern temperate regions (Scotland, United States of America and Sweden). The objective is to understand how the role of catchment topography as a control on the TTs differs in contrasting geographical settings. Catchment inverse transit time proxies (ITTPs) were inferred by a simple metric of isotopic tracer damping, using the ratio of standard deviation of delta(18)O in streamwater to the standard deviation of delta(18)O in precipitation. Quantitative landscape analysis was undertaken to characterize the catchments according to hydrologically relevant topographic indices: that could be readily determined from a digital terrain model (DTM). The nature of topographic controls on transit times varied markedly in different geomorphic regions. In steeper montane regions. there are stronger gravitational influences on hydraulic gradients and TTs tend to he lower in the steepest catchments. In provinces where terrain is more subdued, direct topographic control weakened; in particular, where flatter areas with less permeable soils give rise to overland How and lower The steeper slopes within this flatter terrain appear to have a greater coverage of freely draining soils, which increase sub-surface flow, therefore increasing TTs. Quantitative landscape analysis proved a useful tool for intercatchment comparison. However, the critical influence of sub-surface permeability and connectivity may limit the transferability of predictive tools of hydrological function based on topographic parameters alone. Copyright (C) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
AB - Despite an increasing number of empirical investigations of catchment transit times (TTs), virtually all are based on individual catchments and there are few attempts to synthesize understanding across different geographical regions. Uniquely, this paper examines data from 55 catchments in five geomorphic provinces in northern temperate regions (Scotland, United States of America and Sweden). The objective is to understand how the role of catchment topography as a control on the TTs differs in contrasting geographical settings. Catchment inverse transit time proxies (ITTPs) were inferred by a simple metric of isotopic tracer damping, using the ratio of standard deviation of delta(18)O in streamwater to the standard deviation of delta(18)O in precipitation. Quantitative landscape analysis was undertaken to characterize the catchments according to hydrologically relevant topographic indices: that could be readily determined from a digital terrain model (DTM). The nature of topographic controls on transit times varied markedly in different geomorphic regions. In steeper montane regions. there are stronger gravitational influences on hydraulic gradients and TTs tend to he lower in the steepest catchments. In provinces where terrain is more subdued, direct topographic control weakened; in particular, where flatter areas with less permeable soils give rise to overland How and lower The steeper slopes within this flatter terrain appear to have a greater coverage of freely draining soils, which increase sub-surface flow, therefore increasing TTs. Quantitative landscape analysis proved a useful tool for intercatchment comparison. However, the critical influence of sub-surface permeability and connectivity may limit the transferability of predictive tools of hydrological function based on topographic parameters alone. Copyright (C) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
KW - catchment transit times
KW - landscape structure
KW - geomorphic provinces
KW - isotopic tracers
KW - quantitative landscape analysis
KW - northern temperate regions
KW - catchment transit times
KW - landscape structure
KW - geomorphic provinces
KW - isotopic tracers
KW - quantitative landscape analysis
KW - northern temperate regions
UR - https://res.slu.se/id/publ/27552
U2 - 10.1002/hyp.7240
DO - 10.1002/hyp.7240
M3 - Journal article
SN - 0885-6087
VL - 23
SP - 945
EP - 953
JO - Hydrological Processes
JF - Hydrological Processes
IS - 6
ER -