Abstract
While modern wheat has been bred for improved yields and baking properties, heritage cereals have recently gained increased recognition for their nutritional profiles and resilience towards climate change. This increased interest in heritage cereals calls for deepened understanding of their sensory attributes and consumer acceptance. Hence, this study evaluated bread based on two heritage wheats (Oland and Kallunda) and a modern wheat mix by the means of quantitative descriptive sensory analysis (n = 8) and consumer liking (n = 47) using a 9-point hedonic scale. The sensory profiles of the three breads were similar, with differences mainly in the crust's brownness, roasted odor, chewiness, and hardness. These differences were not linked to whether the wheat was heritage or modern. Overall, consumers gave positive scores for the crumb and crust of all three bread types: Oland (6.38 and 6.87), Kallunda (6.53 and 6.19), and Modern (6.26 and 6.49). Among all participants, 68.1 %- 85.1 % gave positive scores for the breads. Oland wheat crust was better liked than crust from Kallunda wheat, which related to less roasted odor, brown appearance, chewy and hard textures. The study's implications for gastronomy includes that heritage wheat can be used like modern varieties without impeding sensory quality, making them versatile for various foods and cuisines.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 101165 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science |
| Volume | 40 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2025 The Authors
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 2 Zero Hunger
Keywords
- Consumer acceptance
- Descriptive sensory profile
- Ecological sustainability
- Health
- Heritage wheat
- Local cereals
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver