TY - JOUR
T1 - Heat resistance in liquids of Enterococcus spp., Listeria spp., Escherichia coli, Yersinia enterocolitica, Salmonella spp. and Campylobacter spp
AU - Sörqvist, S
PY - 2003
Y1 - 2003
N2 - The aim of the work was to collect, evaluate, summarize and compare heat resistance data reported for Campylobacter, Enterococcus, Escherichia, Listeria, Salmonella and Yersinia spp. The work was limited to resistance in liquids with pH values 6-8. Results obtained under similar experimental conditions were sought. Thermal destruction lines for the various bacterial groups studied were constructed using log(10) D values and treatment temperatures. There was a good linear relationship between log(10) D and temperature with Escherichia coli, listerias and salmonellas. For campylobacters, enterococci and yersinias the relationships were weaker but, nevertheless, present. Using the slopes of the lines and their 95% confidence limits, z values and their 95% confidence limits were calculated. z values were compared with z values obtained from reports. The equations for the lines were also used for calculation of predicted means of D values at various treatment temperatures. 95% confidence limits on predicted means of D values and on predicted individual D values were also calculated. Lines and values are shown in figures and tables. Differences in heat resistance noted between and within the bacterial groups studied are discussed.
AB - The aim of the work was to collect, evaluate, summarize and compare heat resistance data reported for Campylobacter, Enterococcus, Escherichia, Listeria, Salmonella and Yersinia spp. The work was limited to resistance in liquids with pH values 6-8. Results obtained under similar experimental conditions were sought. Thermal destruction lines for the various bacterial groups studied were constructed using log(10) D values and treatment temperatures. There was a good linear relationship between log(10) D and temperature with Escherichia coli, listerias and salmonellas. For campylobacters, enterococci and yersinias the relationships were weaker but, nevertheless, present. Using the slopes of the lines and their 95% confidence limits, z values and their 95% confidence limits were calculated. z values were compared with z values obtained from reports. The equations for the lines were also used for calculation of predicted means of D values at various treatment temperatures. 95% confidence limits on predicted means of D values and on predicted individual D values were also calculated. Lines and values are shown in figures and tables. Differences in heat resistance noted between and within the bacterial groups studied are discussed.
KW - Campylobacter jejuni/coli
KW - Enterococcus faecalis
KW - Enterococcus faecium
KW - Escherichia coli
KW - Listeria innocua
KW - Listeria ivanovii
KW - Listeria monocytogenes
KW - Listeria seeligeri
KW - Listeria welshimeri
KW - Salmonella
KW - Yersinia enterocolitica
KW - thermal resistance
KW - influencing factors
KW - methods of determination
KW - differences between species
KW - differences between strains
KW - Campylobacter jejuni/coli
KW - Enterococcus faecalis
KW - Enterococcus faecium
KW - Escherichia coli
KW - Listeria innocua
KW - Listeria ivanovii
KW - Listeria monocytogenes
KW - Listeria seeligeri
KW - Listeria welshimeri
KW - Salmonella
KW - Yersinia enterocolitica
KW - thermal resistance
KW - influencing factors
KW - methods of determination
KW - differences between species
KW - differences between strains
UR - https://res.slu.se/id/publ/1284
U2 - 10.1186/1751-0147-44-1
DO - 10.1186/1751-0147-44-1
M3 - Review article
C2 - 14650540
SN - 0044-605X
VL - 44
SP - 45676
JO - Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
JF - Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
IS - 45659
ER -