Abstract
While gender issues are becoming increasingly integrated in international environment and development policies, the simplistic manner in which they are treated holds scant promise for real change. In the Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) program in Burkina Faso, women are targeted in projects promoting non-timber forest product commercialisation aimed to incentivise forest conservation. Such policies are often based on essentialist assumptions about what men and women do, ignoring that social relations of inequality need to be understood in context. Drawing on intersectional theory this study analyses REDD+ documents, and data about resource use in two villages in Burkina Faso, showing how the participatory approach in Burkina's REDD+ program is unlikely to encourage currently marginalised voices to be heard in existing forest management organisations. Rather, the lack of acknowledgement of intersecting relations of inequality leads to crucial aspects of NTFP resource use being overlooked, and risks leading to increased marginalisation of certain groups.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 511-521 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | International Forestry Review |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
-
SDG 15 Life on Land
Keywords
- gender
- climate policy
- environmental governance
- intersectionality
- NTFP
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver