TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect-based methods and effect-based trigger values for estrogenicity monitoring in surface water: an interlaboratory study
AU - Gomez, Livia
AU - Marinov, Dimitar
AU - Porcel-Rodriguez, Elena
AU - Scaccabarozzi, Diletta
AU - Sanseverino, Isabella
AU - Sciuto, Pietro
AU - Narendja, Frank
AU - Hornek-Gausterer, Romana
AU - Lenz, Katharina
AU - Chalon, Carole
AU - Marneffe, Yves
AU - Soldan, Premysl
AU - Hora, Martin
AU - Leppanen, Matti T.
AU - Jarvisto, Johanna
AU - Viidanoja, Jyrki
AU - Ait-Aissa, Selim
AU - Maillot-Marechal, Emmanuelle
AU - El Mais, Abd El Rahman
AU - Escher, Beate I.
AU - Konig, Maria
AU - Hollert, Henner
AU - Wollenweber, Simone
AU - Buchinger, Sebastian
AU - Ohlig, Marina
AU - Pedrazzani, Roberta
AU - Lundqvist, Johan
AU - Oskarsson, Agneta
AU - Vermeirssen, Etienne
AU - Maletz, Sibylle
AU - Olbrich, Daniel
AU - Mehinto, Alvine C.
AU - Wong, Kameron
AU - Denslow, Nancy
AU - Amendola, Luca
AU - Gil-Solsona, Ruben
AU - Gago-Ferrero, Pablo
AU - Potalivo, Monica
AU - Carere, Mario
AU - Lettieri, Teresa
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - Effect-based methods (EBMs) may be included in the European Water Framework Directive (WFD) to evaluate estrogenic substances. The European Commission's Joint Research Centre conducted an interlaboratory study to assess estrogenic EBMs and effect-based trigger (EBTs) values derived using three options: (1) linking the EBT value to environmental quality standards (EQS), (2) correlating in vitro and in vivo data, and (3) averaging bioassay-specific EBT values. Surface water samples from eight Northern-Italian sites containing estrogenic hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) were analysed by fourteen laboratories employing EBMs, while four laboratories performed chemical analysis. Chemical data indicated cumulative risk in several samples, with estrone and bisphenol A identified as main drivers. All EBMs detected estrogenic activity, but specificity differed: some bioassays responded mainly to hormones, whereas others also responded to non-hormonal EDCs. EBMs flagged estrogenic risk in a sample that showed no individual exceedances of EQS. Applying EBT option 1 yielded the highest concordance with chemical results, achieving full compliance in eight bioassays and proven to be the most protective. Indeed, option 2 reduced the risk quotient (RQ) by > 30%, leading to two bioassays in full compliance, while Option 3 resulted in RQ changes (
AB - Effect-based methods (EBMs) may be included in the European Water Framework Directive (WFD) to evaluate estrogenic substances. The European Commission's Joint Research Centre conducted an interlaboratory study to assess estrogenic EBMs and effect-based trigger (EBTs) values derived using three options: (1) linking the EBT value to environmental quality standards (EQS), (2) correlating in vitro and in vivo data, and (3) averaging bioassay-specific EBT values. Surface water samples from eight Northern-Italian sites containing estrogenic hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) were analysed by fourteen laboratories employing EBMs, while four laboratories performed chemical analysis. Chemical data indicated cumulative risk in several samples, with estrone and bisphenol A identified as main drivers. All EBMs detected estrogenic activity, but specificity differed: some bioassays responded mainly to hormones, whereas others also responded to non-hormonal EDCs. EBMs flagged estrogenic risk in a sample that showed no individual exceedances of EQS. Applying EBT option 1 yielded the highest concordance with chemical results, achieving full compliance in eight bioassays and proven to be the most protective. Indeed, option 2 reduced the risk quotient (RQ) by > 30%, leading to two bioassays in full compliance, while Option 3 resulted in RQ changes (
KW - Bioassays
KW - Safety thresholds
KW - Water quality monitoring
KW - Chemical mixtures
KW - Hormones
KW - Endocrine-disrupting chemicals
KW - Bioassays
KW - Safety thresholds
KW - Water quality monitoring
KW - Chemical mixtures
KW - Hormones
KW - Endocrine-disrupting chemicals
UR - https://res.slu.se/id/publ/146681
U2 - 10.1016/j.envres.2026.124218
DO - 10.1016/j.envres.2026.124218
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 41796835
SN - 0013-9351
VL - 298
JO - Environmental Research
JF - Environmental Research
M1 - 124218
ER -