Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effect-based methods and effect-based trigger values for estrogenicity monitoring in surface water: an interlaboratory study

  • Livia Gomez
  • , Dimitar Marinov
  • , Elena Porcel-Rodriguez
  • , Diletta Scaccabarozzi
  • , Isabella Sanseverino
  • , Pietro Sciuto
  • , Frank Narendja
  • , Romana Hornek-Gausterer
  • , Katharina Lenz
  • , Carole Chalon
  • , Yves Marneffe
  • , Premysl Soldan
  • , Martin Hora
  • , Matti T. Leppanen
  • , Johanna Jarvisto
  • , Jyrki Viidanoja
  • , Selim Ait-Aissa
  • , Emmanuelle Maillot-Marechal
  • , Abd El Rahman El Mais
  • , Beate I. Escher
  • Maria Konig, Henner Hollert, Simone Wollenweber, Sebastian Buchinger, Marina Ohlig, Roberta Pedrazzani, Johan Lundqvist, Agneta Oskarsson, Etienne Vermeirssen, Sibylle Maletz, Daniel Olbrich, Alvine C. Mehinto, Kameron Wong, Nancy Denslow, Luca Amendola, Ruben Gil-Solsona, Pablo Gago-Ferrero, Monica Potalivo, Mario Carere, Teresa Lettieri

Publication: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Abstract

Effect-based methods (EBMs) may be included in the European Water Framework Directive (WFD) to evaluate estrogenic substances. The European Commission's Joint Research Centre conducted an interlaboratory study to assess estrogenic EBMs and effect-based trigger (EBTs) values derived using three options: (1) linking the EBT value to environmental quality standards (EQS), (2) correlating in vitro and in vivo data, and (3) averaging bioassay-specific EBT values. Surface water samples from eight Northern-Italian sites containing estrogenic hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) were analysed by fourteen laboratories employing EBMs, while four laboratories performed chemical analysis. Chemical data indicated cumulative risk in several samples, with estrone and bisphenol A identified as main drivers. All EBMs detected estrogenic activity, but specificity differed: some bioassays responded mainly to hormones, whereas others also responded to non-hormonal EDCs. EBMs flagged estrogenic risk in a sample that showed no individual exceedances of EQS. Applying EBT option 1 yielded the highest concordance with chemical results, achieving full compliance in eight bioassays and proven to be the most protective. Indeed, option 2 reduced the risk quotient (RQ) by > 30%, leading to two bioassays in full compliance, while Option 3 resulted in RQ changes (
Original languageEnglish
Article number124218
Number of pages14
JournalEnvironmental Research
Volume298
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2026

Keywords

  • Bioassays
  • Safety thresholds
  • Water quality monitoring
  • Chemical mixtures
  • Hormones
  • Endocrine-disrupting chemicals

Cite this