TY - JOUR
T1 - Conservation biological control and enemy diversity on a landscape scale
AU - Bommarco, Riccardo
AU - Clough, Yann
AU - Crist, Thomas O.
AU - Rand, Tatyana A.
AU - Tylianakis, Jason M.
AU - van Nouhuys, Saskya
AU - Vidal, Stefan
AU - Kleijn, David
AU - Tscharntke, Teja
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
N2 - Conservation biological control in agroecosystems requires a landscape management perspective, because most arthropod species experience their habitat at spatial scales beyond the plot level, and there is spillover of natural enemies across the crop noncrop interface. The species pool in the surrounding landscape and the distance of crop from natural habitat are important for the conservation of enemy diversity and, in particular, the conservation of poorly-dispersing and specialized enemies. Hence, structurally complex landscapes with hi,gh habitat connectivity may enhance the probability of pest regulation. In contrast, generalist and highly vagile enemies may even A p rofit from the high primary productivity of crops at a landscape scale and their abundance may partly compensate for losses in enemy diversity. Conservation biological control also needs a multitrophic perspective. For example, entomopathogenic fungi, plant pathogens and endophytes as well as below- and above-ground microorganisms are known to influence pest-enemy interactions in ways that vary across spatiotemporal scales. Enemy distribution in agricultural landscapes is determined by beta diversity among patches. The diversity needed for conservation biological control may occur where patch heterogeneity at larger spatial scales is high. However, enemy communities in managed systems are more similar across space and time than those in natural systems, emphasizing the importance of natural habitat for a spillover of diverse enemies. According to the insurance hypothesis, species richness can buffer against spatiotemporal disturbances, thereby insuring functioning in changing environments. Seemingly redundant enemy species may become important under global change. Complex landscapes characterized by highly connected crop-noncrop mosaics may be best for long-term conservation biological control and sustainable crop production, but experimental evidence for detailed recommendations to design the composition and configuration of agricultural landscapes that maintain a diversity of generalist and specialist natural enemies is still needed. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
AB - Conservation biological control in agroecosystems requires a landscape management perspective, because most arthropod species experience their habitat at spatial scales beyond the plot level, and there is spillover of natural enemies across the crop noncrop interface. The species pool in the surrounding landscape and the distance of crop from natural habitat are important for the conservation of enemy diversity and, in particular, the conservation of poorly-dispersing and specialized enemies. Hence, structurally complex landscapes with hi,gh habitat connectivity may enhance the probability of pest regulation. In contrast, generalist and highly vagile enemies may even A p rofit from the high primary productivity of crops at a landscape scale and their abundance may partly compensate for losses in enemy diversity. Conservation biological control also needs a multitrophic perspective. For example, entomopathogenic fungi, plant pathogens and endophytes as well as below- and above-ground microorganisms are known to influence pest-enemy interactions in ways that vary across spatiotemporal scales. Enemy distribution in agricultural landscapes is determined by beta diversity among patches. The diversity needed for conservation biological control may occur where patch heterogeneity at larger spatial scales is high. However, enemy communities in managed systems are more similar across space and time than those in natural systems, emphasizing the importance of natural habitat for a spillover of diverse enemies. According to the insurance hypothesis, species richness can buffer against spatiotemporal disturbances, thereby insuring functioning in changing environments. Seemingly redundant enemy species may become important under global change. Complex landscapes characterized by highly connected crop-noncrop mosaics may be best for long-term conservation biological control and sustainable crop production, but experimental evidence for detailed recommendations to design the composition and configuration of agricultural landscapes that maintain a diversity of generalist and specialist natural enemies is still needed. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
KW - agroecosystems
KW - beta diversity
KW - dispersal
KW - habitat fragmentation
KW - insurance hypothesis
KW - multitrophic interactions
KW - parasitoid and predator spillover
KW - SLOSS
KW - spatial ecology
KW - specialists vs. generalists
KW - sustainability
KW - agroecosystems
KW - beta diversity
KW - dispersal
KW - habitat fragmentation
KW - insurance hypothesis
KW - multitrophic interactions
KW - parasitoid and predator spillover
KW - SLOSS
KW - spatial ecology
KW - specialists vs. generalists
KW - sustainability
UR - https://res.slu.se/id/publ/15417
U2 - 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.08.006
DO - 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.08.006
M3 - Review article
SN - 1049-9644
VL - 43
SP - 294
EP - 309
JO - Biological Control
JF - Biological Control
IS - 3
ER -