TY - JOUR
T1 - Codesigning sustainable land uses: framing participatory methods for research and development projects
AU - Sachet, Erwan
AU - Mertz, Ole
AU - Vanegas, Martha
AU - Cruz-Garcia, Gisella S. S.
AU - Beltran, Marcela
AU - Angel-Sanchez, Yimi Katherine
AU - Zapata, Yuly Catalina
AU - Lavelle, Patrick
AU - Solarte, Antonio
AU - Suarez, Juan Carlos
AU - Alvarez, Faver
AU - Romero, Miguel
AU - Rico, Adrian
AU - Sierra, Leidi
AU - Quintero, Marcela
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - The application of participatory methods for codesigning sustainable land uses in research and development (R&D) projects for the agroecological transition are receiving increasing attention. However, there has been limited research critically assessing participatory methods employed in a codesign process. We therefore analyze the participatory methods applied for codesigning alternative land uses in the Sustainable Amazonian Landscape (SAL) project in the Caqueta department, Colombia. We conducted our analysis by situating the codesign process in a participation continuum and a codesign typology. We found that a gradient of participation level in the R&D project is beneficial for managing a codesign process. Thus, codesigning can be shaped during the project to respond to specific needs, and farmer participation levels change during the project. We found that codesigning is a process that only partially relies on participatory methods epistemologies. Instead, it reflects a tension between the continuity of a codesign project in a given territory, the sustained involvement of local partners, and external conditions such as socioeconomic and institutional stability. These are essential points to consider for co-designing the agroecological transition, as we suggest that these project-based research conditions might hinder critical principles of the codesign process.
AB - The application of participatory methods for codesigning sustainable land uses in research and development (R&D) projects for the agroecological transition are receiving increasing attention. However, there has been limited research critically assessing participatory methods employed in a codesign process. We therefore analyze the participatory methods applied for codesigning alternative land uses in the Sustainable Amazonian Landscape (SAL) project in the Caqueta department, Colombia. We conducted our analysis by situating the codesign process in a participation continuum and a codesign typology. We found that a gradient of participation level in the R&D project is beneficial for managing a codesign process. Thus, codesigning can be shaped during the project to respond to specific needs, and farmer participation levels change during the project. We found that codesigning is a process that only partially relies on participatory methods epistemologies. Instead, it reflects a tension between the continuity of a codesign project in a given territory, the sustained involvement of local partners, and external conditions such as socioeconomic and institutional stability. These are essential points to consider for co-designing the agroecological transition, as we suggest that these project-based research conditions might hinder critical principles of the codesign process.
KW - Colombian Amazon
KW - Project-based R&D
KW - agroecological transition
KW - codesign
KW - participatory methods
KW - Colombian Amazon
KW - Project-based R&D
KW - agroecological transition
KW - codesign
KW - participatory methods
UR - https://res.slu.se/id/publ/130446
U2 - 10.1080/21683565.2022.2164638
DO - 10.1080/21683565.2022.2164638
M3 - Journal article
SN - 2168-3565
VL - 47
SP - 413
EP - 440
JO - Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems
JF - Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems
IS - 3
ER -