Abstract
Within the European Union, it is agreed that watershed-based management of water quality problems is more efficient than centralised arrangements. In this study, a mechanism for allocating international funds to watershed authorities for nitrogen abatement in the presence of moral hazard is investigated. The results show that when there is a risk of climate change, the cost of moral hazard to the international funding agency can be high if there is a moderate likelihood of climate change and the watershed authority is guaranteed a high minimum compensation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 327-351 |
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | European Review of Agricultural Economics |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2014 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
Keywords
- nitrogen
- climate change
- moral hazard
- Baltic Sea
- policy instruments
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver