TY - JOUR
T1 - Camera traps and acoustic approaches are needed to monitor Malagasy seed dispersers
AU - Andriamavosoloarisoa, Niaina Nirina Mahefa
AU - Cromsigt, Joris P. G. M.
AU - Hofmeester, Tim R.
AU - Johnson, Steig E.
AU - Lauha, Patrik
AU - Lubberink, Nicole Scholte
AU - Narváez-Torres, Pamela R.
AU - Raharinjanahary, Dimby
AU - Rajoelison, Eric Tsiriniaina
AU - Randrianaina, Linah
AU - Ratsimba, Famenontsoa Rojomalala Fiononana
AU - Razafindratsima, Onja H.
AU - Ravaomanalina, Bako Harisoa
AU - Andriantsaralaza, Seheno
AU - Holmes, Sheila M.
PY - 2026/6/15
Y1 - 2026/6/15
N2 - Despite extensive conservation efforts worldwide, biodiversity loss continues, particularly in tropical regions. It is, therefore, essential to develop biodiversity monitoring methods that can be effectively scaled up in both time and space, enabling wildlife managers to quickly assess and respond to changes in populations or communities. We explored the effectiveness of combining camera traps with acoustic methods to survey seed dispersing birds and mammals. We deployed arboreal and terrestrial camera traps alongside AudioMoth sound recorders with varying recording schedules to survey 220 sampling locations across five distinct sites in Madagascar’s eastern humid forests, though acoustic analyses were limited to one site. Based on all three methods (arboreal, terrestrial camera trap and AudioMoths), we successfully identified 78 % of the seed disperser species assumed to be present at our sites. The species accumulation curves estimated higher species richness for arboreal cameras than for terrestrial cameras, and for mature protected forests compared to other habitats. Species composition differed between the two types of cameras, while bird species composition in Ranomafana differed between camera traps and AudioMoths. Arboreal camera traps detected more frugivorous primate, bird, and bat species while terrestrial camera traps detected more ground-dwelling vertebrate species. Where both cameras and AudioMoths were deployed species composition differed significantly, with AudioMoths detecting more vocal bird species. These results highlight the need for a combined approach to fully survey the seed-dispersal community, along with further development of acoustic analysis techniques for future studies.
AB - Despite extensive conservation efforts worldwide, biodiversity loss continues, particularly in tropical regions. It is, therefore, essential to develop biodiversity monitoring methods that can be effectively scaled up in both time and space, enabling wildlife managers to quickly assess and respond to changes in populations or communities. We explored the effectiveness of combining camera traps with acoustic methods to survey seed dispersing birds and mammals. We deployed arboreal and terrestrial camera traps alongside AudioMoth sound recorders with varying recording schedules to survey 220 sampling locations across five distinct sites in Madagascar’s eastern humid forests, though acoustic analyses were limited to one site. Based on all three methods (arboreal, terrestrial camera trap and AudioMoths), we successfully identified 78 % of the seed disperser species assumed to be present at our sites. The species accumulation curves estimated higher species richness for arboreal cameras than for terrestrial cameras, and for mature protected forests compared to other habitats. Species composition differed between the two types of cameras, while bird species composition in Ranomafana differed between camera traps and AudioMoths. Arboreal camera traps detected more frugivorous primate, bird, and bat species while terrestrial camera traps detected more ground-dwelling vertebrate species. Where both cameras and AudioMoths were deployed species composition differed significantly, with AudioMoths detecting more vocal bird species. These results highlight the need for a combined approach to fully survey the seed-dispersal community, along with further development of acoustic analysis techniques for future studies.
UR - https://res.slu.se/id/publ/fd5b4be7-e87a-4369-b091-3ca63f05da87
U2 - 10.1007/s10531-026-03371-3
DO - 10.1007/s10531-026-03371-3
M3 - Journal article
SN - 0960-3115
VL - 35
JO - Biodiversity and Conservation
JF - Biodiversity and Conservation
IS - 8
M1 - 188
ER -