TY - JOUR
T1 - A method for extracting plant roots from soil which facilitates rapid sample processing without compromising measurement accuracy
AU - Metcalfe, Daniel
AU - da Costa, A.C.L.
AU - Braga, A.P.
AU - de Athaydes Silva Junior, J.
AU - Aragao, L.E.O.C.
AU - Williams, M.
AU - Meir, P.
AU - Goncalves, P.H.L.
AU - de Almeida, S.S.
AU - Malhi, Y.
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
N2 - This study evaluates a novel method for extracting roots from soil samples and applies it to estimate standing crop root mass (+/- confidence intervals) in an eastern Amazon rainforest. Roots were manually extracted from soil cores over a period of 40 min, which was split into 10 min time intervals. The pattern of cumulative extraction over time was used to predict root extraction beyond 40 min. A maximum-likelihood approach was used to calculate confidence intervals. The temporal prediction method added 21-32% to initial estimates of standing crop root mass. According to predictions, complete manual root extraction from 18 samples would have taken c. 239 h, compared with 12 h using the prediction method. Uncertainties (percentage difference between mean, and 10th and 90th percentiles) introduced by the prediction method were small (12-15%), compared with uncertainties caused by spatial variation in root mass (72-191%, for nine samples per plot surveyed). This method provides a way of increasing the number of root samples processed per unit time, without compromising measurement accuracy.
AB - This study evaluates a novel method for extracting roots from soil samples and applies it to estimate standing crop root mass (+/- confidence intervals) in an eastern Amazon rainforest. Roots were manually extracted from soil cores over a period of 40 min, which was split into 10 min time intervals. The pattern of cumulative extraction over time was used to predict root extraction beyond 40 min. A maximum-likelihood approach was used to calculate confidence intervals. The temporal prediction method added 21-32% to initial estimates of standing crop root mass. According to predictions, complete manual root extraction from 18 samples would have taken c. 239 h, compared with 12 h using the prediction method. Uncertainties (percentage difference between mean, and 10th and 90th percentiles) introduced by the prediction method were small (12-15%), compared with uncertainties caused by spatial variation in root mass (72-191%, for nine samples per plot surveyed). This method provides a way of increasing the number of root samples processed per unit time, without compromising measurement accuracy.
KW - Amazon tropical rainforest
KW - maximum-likelihood approach
KW - methodological evaluation
KW - root sampling method
KW - standing crop root mass
KW - temporal prediction method
KW - Amazon tropical rainforest
KW - maximum-likelihood approach
KW - methodological evaluation
KW - root sampling method
KW - standing crop root mass
KW - temporal prediction method
UR - https://res.slu.se/id/publ/15232
U2 - 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02032.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02032.x
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 17447923
SN - 0028-646X
VL - 174
SP - 697
EP - 703
JO - New Phytologist
JF - New Phytologist
IS - 3
ER -